Farmers' Institutes

meetings of farmers and others held to inculcate improved methods of agriculture. These meetings take many forms. A typical institute occupies a day, an evening, and a day--five sessions in all. A force of specialists is engaged to provide a succession of lively, informal, instructive talks on topics of timely and local interest. Stump pulling, tiling, open ditching, fallow, the dust blanket, green manure, commercial fertilizers, soil inoculation, seed testing, plant breeding, rotation of crops, alfalfa, kaffir corn, curing clover, silos, corn shellers, improved varieties of seed, stock judging, veterinary practice, stabling, ventilating, breaking to halter and to harness, testing for butter-fat, butter breeds and beef breeds, feeding, breeding, tests for tuberculosis, wool, mutton, lambing, docking, dipping, shearing, foot rot, hog cholera, poultry houses, chickens for eggs and poultry for market, quack grass, grafting, pruning, seedlings, picking, marketing, cooperating, and roadmaking are only a few of the many topics which live institute workers handle with vivacity and a deal of good natured back talk; for farmers are an informal, hard-headed lot, not perhaps unwilling to learn, and yet decidedly unwilling to accept theory. The most effective work is done by intelligent men who are able to relate their own experiences forcefully. A well balanced program contains numbers pertaining to household management. Not infrequently a woman holds auxiliary meetings for farmers' wives.

The institute idea is over half a century old. As early as 1853 farmers' institutes were suggested by the secretary of the Massachusetts Board of Agriculture. In 1871 meetings of this sort were held in Illinois and in Iowa. In the same year Vermont and New Hampshire provided for annual institutes. Beginning with 1876, Michigan has maintained a continuous system of farmers' institutes. In 1908 4,926 institutes, large and small, were held in forty-five states and territories, and were attended by no less than 2,196,568 persons. The expense is borne largely by the several states; the state appropriations for the year named were $338,000. In some states the entire management is vested in a central bureau or director, connected not infrequently with the state agricultural college. In other states the institutes are controlled by local organizations; and again there is joint control. Not infrequently local speakers and state workers join forces. Very excellent institute workers have been drawn from the province of Ontario.