Collier's New Encyclopedia

A complete general encyclopedia of 1921 — the world as it was understood just after the Great War, from Aachen to Zwingli, across twelve volumes and six thousand pages.

HomeC › Constellation

Constellation

a group or configuration of stars, within certain boundaries, to which a definite name has been assigned, the name being generally expressed in its Latin for the sake of international convenience and of exactness. This grouping is almost entirely artificial, though some of the configurations bear some resemblance to the object indicated by the name. History. Before the invention of almanacs the risings and settings of the constellations were looked to by husbandmen, shepherds, and sea-faring men as the landmarks of the seasons, and of the weather which each season was expected to bring. The earliest description that we have of the constellations is the poem by Aratus, called "The Phenomena of Aratus," about 280 в. c. The Greek sphere used by Hipparchus, 125 в. c., appears to be the earliest known accurate representation of the positions and magnitudes of the stars, and upon this they were grouped into 48 constellations. We know of this work through the description of it in Ptolemy's "Megale Syntaxis, ," A. D. 170. This was translated by the Saracens into Arabic, A. D. 813-832, and miscalled by them the "Almagest," and it is principally through translations of this work that we know of these 48 CONSTELLATION original asterisms. Various astronomers have since then added a host of others, but most of these have fallen into disuse.

Lettering the Stars. In 1603 Bayer, in his "Uranometria," immortalized him self by the happy thought of assigning letters to the individual stars of each of the 48 constellations of the "Almagest" beginning with the Greek alphabet and following approximately the order of brightness of the stars, and then using the lower-case Roman letters where needed to complete any constellation. Some confusion has arisen, especially in those extending far toward the S., in trying to identify all of Bayer's lettered stars. Argelander's "Uranometria Nova" is, however, accepted to-day, with a few trifling exceptions, as the correct interpretation of Bayer. Lacaille, at the Cape, 1751- 1752, extended the same system to the southern constellations, and was also compelled to revise the lettering of a few of Bayer's most southern ones, which were very inaccurately delineated. As far N. as his work extended, to +10° of declination, Dr. Gould also assigned letters in the constellations still unlettered, Monorceros, Scutum, and Sextans. In the northern constellations added by Hevelius, or between his time and Ptolemy, and which had not been lettered, Bailey assigned a few Greek letters when publishing the " B. A. C." (British Association Catalogue) in 1845. These letters will probably stand in any future revision of the northern heavens, though they are not very generally used by astronomers to-day. It should also be noted that the last letters of the capital Roman alphabet, beginning with R, are reserved for the variable stars. This has been agreed upon since Argelander's time, and has compelled the abandonment of several such letters assigned by Lacaille in the southern heavens to stars that are not variables. Flamsteed's numbers in each constellation of the stars observed by him are also extensively used as a system of naming individual stars.

These numbers refer to the order in which the stars occur in each constellation in his "Catalogus Britannicus." Other early catalogues of stars arranged in this way by constellations are often used as a means of naming individual stars, especially that of Hevelius, a capital H being used in this case. These numbers refer, not to the arrangement of the stars in Hevelius's original "Prodomus Astronomix" (1690), nor to Bailey's edition of it in the 13th volume of the "Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society," but to Flamsteed's edition of the catalogue as published in the third volume of the "Historia Cælestis Britan- CONSTITUTION nica," London, 1725, and considerable confusion has at times arisen from ignorance of this fact.

← ConstantiusConstipation →