The Meta-Encyclopedia

Building and Loan Associations

Aiton's Encyclopedia (1910)

cooperative unions designed to receive the savings of many wage-earning members and loan them to a few members for the building of houses. The system originated in Philadelphia about 1835. It has spread over a large part of the United States , until the various associations are credited with doing not less than $750,000,000 worth of business annually. The gist of the plan and the secret of its success lies in low expenses and the putting of many small savings at interest promptly. On the other hand, the moneys are loaned on good security to be returned, interest and principal, usually in weekly payments running through a term of ten to fourteen years. Though the total amount returned by the borrowing member may not exceed the principal and interest for the entire term at, let us say six percent per annum, the rate of profit to the association will be at least twice six per cent. In the first place, the borrower returns part of the principal out of his first week's wages, which he can do quite as well as to hold his savings for a large payment. On a fourteen-year plan, he holds only the last installment of principal fourteen years with an average time of seven years. Interest is also paid weekly instead of being held for an annual payment. The wage earner is far more certain of himself in making many small payments than in trying to accumulate for large payments. So, without hardship to the borrower, in fact, while helping him, the non-borrowing members of the association are encouraged to save and receive from three to five times as much interest as savings banks could afford to pay them. The success of local societies has encouraged the organization of associations that operate over large territory. Many of these from the first have been mere schemes to despoil the depositor. Salaries and other expenses have eaten up all possible dividends, and recklessness in placing loans has caused loss. Others, organized in good faith, have not been successful. In general it may be said that a building and loan association should remain local, and confine its business to loans that may be looked after by a committee of members, or, at most, by a trusted secretary acting under the direction of an executive committee. There were in the United States in 1909 5,599 building and loan associations, having 1,920,257 members and assets valued at $784,175,753.

What Has Changed in the Last Century

When Aiton's wrote this in 1910 it counted 5,599 associations holding $784 million in assets, and warned that safety lay in staying small and local. The advice held for decades — these mutuals grew into the savings and loan industry that financed the postwar suburbs on the 30-year mortgage — but the model collapsed after deregulation in the early 1980s let thrifts chase risky lending; more than a thousand failed, the federal insurance fund went bust, and Congress created the Resolution Trust Corporation in 1989 to liquidate the wreckage at a taxpayer cost usually put at well over $100 billion. The specialist regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, was itself abolished under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. A few mutual savings institutions survive, but home lending today runs through commercial banks, nonbank mortgage companies and the government-backed secondary market rather than through weekly payments to a neighborhood association.

Written for this edition, 2026.