Instinct
Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)
according to Hamilton, an agent which performs, blindly and 66 ignorantly, a work of intelligence and knowledge." Brougham says that instinct is distinguished from reason, in that "it acts without teaching, either from others that is instruction, or from the animal itself - that is experience"; "it acts without knowledge of consequences; it acts blindly, and accomplishes a purpose of which the animal is ignorant." In general, we find that instinct and reason prevail in an animal in the inverse ratio to each other. Hence, in man, whose re reasoning powers are highly developed, the instincts are few, and manifest themselves principally in children and barbarians. An instinct ive action is performed without any consciousness, on the part of the agent, of the end which it serves; it is effected as perfectly the first time as at any subsequent period; and is unsusceptible of any adaptation to particular emergencies; while a reasonable action, on the contrary, is one which always implies a consciousness, on the part of the agent, of the end in view-which becomes only progressively perfect, and which is capable of being variously modified according to existing circumstances. Three classes of theories have been proposed to account for the instinctive actions: 1. The physical, which makes them depend on the structure and organization of the animal. 2. The psychical, which regards them as the result of mental powers or faculties possessed by the animals, analogous to those of the understanding in man. 3. The supernatural, which views them as workings of an intelligence superior to man, or the Supreme Being.
What Has Changed in the Last Century
Collier's in 1921 could still offer a "supernatural" theory of instinct as one of three live options, and asserted that instinct and reason vary in inverse ratio, so that in man instincts are few and show mostly "in children and barbarians" — a ranking of peoples no scientist would defend now. From the 1930s Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch built the experimental study of animal behaviour around observable units such as the fixed action pattern, releasing stimulus and imprinting, work that won them the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Their findings undid the claim that instinctive acts are "as perfect the first time as at any subsequent period" and unmodifiable: birdsong, for instance, typically requires hearing a tutor during a sensitive period, and Daniel Lehrman's 1953 critique pressed the point that no behaviour is purely innate. Biologists today mostly avoid the bare word "instinct" in favour of species-typical or innate behaviour, and treat every behaviour as the joint product of genes, development and environment rather than a faculty opposed to reason.
Written for this edition, 2026.